Last week we had a question, which turns up regularly
in the interactions we have with friends and followers.
Why would
you want lithium batteries, aren’t they more expensive?
Battery talk is one of the favourite topics for avid
cruisers and as I usually just listen, I have been able to gauge a few strands
of knowledge along the way... not at all an expert though, so this blog will
simply answer in a basic way the questions we received.
Nearly a year ago now we replaced 8 Lifeline Absorbent Glass Matt (AGM) batteries with 2 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries
on Impi. At the moment we are doing a
bit of an evaluation of the system with the help of Jack Peters, Outback
Marine, Southport.
So this blog will explore the basic differences
between AGM and LiFePO4 batteries, more in particular the batteries as sold by
EV Power on the West Coast of Australia. It is aimed at people with little
knowledge of batteries and is not trying to educate electronics engineers!
Let’s take a hypothetical case of a boat where the
owners want to have 300 ampere hours (Ah) per day available to use.
In theory a 300 Ah battery pack can
deliver 300 amperes (amps or A) for 1 hour or 10 amps for 30 hours. In practice however if you let an AGM battery
discharge to more than 50%, the number of cycles expected in the life cycle of the battery, reduces.
It is even better to stay over 60% meaning that you can utilize 40% of
the total capacity before recharging.
Looking at the above graph you can see that the
expected cycles for an AGM battery discharged to 60% is 800. In order to have 300 Ah available without
recharging your battery you need to have a capacity of 750 Ah.
A LiFePO4 battery can safely be discharged to 80%,
but let’s just say we keep it conservative and discharge only to 70%. This means that to discharge 300 Ah from
the battery, without recharging, you need a 375 Ah battery pack. The expected number of cycles with a depth of
discharge of 80% is 2000 cycles. Discharging to 70% should give you slightly
more cycles but let’s keep it at 2000 cycles as stated in the specifications below.
Let’s compare the cost of the purchase of the
batteries excluding the installation cost per cycle.
AGM
|
Batteries Direct
Australia
|
|
300 amp usable
|
750 Ah pack
|
5*150 Ah batteries
|
Cost for bank
|
5*$937 = $4685
|
|
Weight
|
5*43.50kg = 217.5kg
|
|
Cycles
|
800
|
|
Cost per cycle
|
$5.86
|
|
Outback Marine Southport
|
||
750 Ah pack
|
5*150Ah batteries
|
|
Cost for bank
|
5*$936=$4680
|
|
Weight
|
5*43.50kg = 217.5kg
|
|
Cycles
|
800
|
|
Cost per cycle
|
$5.85
|
|
And for the LiFePO4
LiFePO4
|
EV Power
|
375 Ah pack
|
400Ah pack
|
Cost for bank in 2016/17
|
$3,200
|
Weight
|
52kg
|
Cycles
|
2000
|
Battery Management System
|
$484
|
GST
|
$369
|
Transport
|
$405
|
Total cost
|
$4,458
|
Cost per cycle
|
$2.23
|
In this comparison, it seems that excluding the installation costs, the
LiFePO4 are less than half the price of the AGM batteries per cycle at a
quarter of the weight. They also take significantly less space.
Now we have all heard stories of exploding lithium batteries, so are we
doing something dangerous by installing these batteries?
There are several types of
lithium ion batteries and it has been proven that the LiFePO4 are way safer
than other types of lithium ion batteries such as for example Lithium Ion
Polymer batteries. Reasons for this are
a higher thermal and chemical stability, safer cathode material and more
structurally stable cells.
LiFePO4 cells are much harder to ignite in the event of mishandling,
however in order to prevent failure of the battery it is important to have a
Battery Management System (BMS).
What does the BMS do?
A 12V LiFePO4 battery is
made up of 4 cells of which the optimum charging voltage is 3.55V for each
cell. So for the complete battery the
optimum charging voltage is 14.2 V in absorption charging and 13.6 V in float
charging.
It is important to
understand the difference between bulk, absorption and float charging for
batteries. Simply explained the
different stages of charging explain the ability of a battery to absorb
charge. AGM batteries have 3 stages of charging: bulk, absorption and float. LiFePO4 have also 3 stages however the absorption stage is very short which leads to some sources saying that there are only two stages.
Bulk charging means that an AGM battery accepts as much amperage as your charger is rated for.
The number of amps
going into the battery bank should however not be greater than 25% to 30% of the
capacity of your battery. For example the maximum amps
going into a 750Ah AGM battery bank should not be greater than about 180 amps to 220 amps. There is some disagreement on this depending on the sources. We have found in practice however that in our AGM installation, due to battery efficiency it tended to be towards the lower number. Charging at 180 amps to 220 amps can be achieved by having 2 Victron
chargers wired in parallel. This is the
installation we have on Impi.
In the case of LiFePO4 in bulk charging the voltage increases steadily whereas the current is close to the maximum the charger can output. The battery accepts about 100 to 110 amps from a single 120A Victron
charger or up to 220A from 2 chargers wired in parallel. Here we can charge a
battery pack with the amperage of about half its capacity.
During bulk charging the
voltage increases up to the absorption voltage while your charger is delivering the maximum current that it can. For LiFePO4 this voltage should be 14.2V and
definitely no higher than 14.6V. For AGM
batteries the voltage is between 14.3 and 14.8V.
LiFePO4 batteries have a very short absorption stage during which the voltage remains at 14.2 but the current decreases. However for AGM batteries the
absorption stage kicks in when the battery is around 80% full. During this
stage the number of amps absorbed, declines. The absorption stage ends when
the number of amps going into the battery falls below a preset number. This
stage takes more time. The last
remaining 20% of an AGM battery take much more time in comparison with the
first 20% during the bulk stage assuming you started at 60% depth of discharge.
The batteries achieve float
stage when they are at about 95% charged depending on the chargers. In float the
voltage drops for AGM batteries to 13.2V and for LifePO4 to13.6V. Only a
trickle charge is absorbed into the batteries until they are 100% full.
Most AGM batteries on boat installations also require
regular equalization which is basically an overcharge for a limited time to
avoid sulphation of the battery plates and which equalizes the strength of the
electrolyte. This is not required for LiFePO4 batteries.
From this explanation it
is clear that LifePo4 batteries have the following advantages:
Greater charging
efficiency
Faster charging
No equalization
The draw back with LiFePO4
batteries is that even a single over charge or over-discharge can seriously
damage your batteries. LifePO4 batteries also require cell balancing to
maintain a consistent state of charge across all the cells of a battery. These
roles are assumed by the BMS.
For the LiFePO4 batteries,
overcharging is when the charge is greater than 15V or with a safety margin,
greater than 14.6V and over-discharging is when the voltage is less than 10V or
with a safety margin, less than 11.0V.
So your Battery Management
System will shut down the batteries in case of over charging or
over-discharging.
The EV Power Battery
Management System consists of two parts:
The Battery Control Unit
(BCU) – one per battery pack of 400AH, it monitors the battery voltage and the
cell module loop and takes action to prevent charging and discharging if there
is a fault.
The Cell Modules – one per
cell act as stand alone shunt balances and link together to provide cell
voltage monitoring.
It is also important to
check that the voltage of your input currents remains below 15V. This role is
assumed by the Victron inverter chargers for shore power and generator. The
regulators enable us to set the voltage of the current delivered by alternators
and the MPPT controller ensures that the solar power current is within the
limits acceptable by the batteries. These
devices have settings for different batteries including LiFePO4 batteries. There are other brand chargers however which would not be compatible.
So a boat converting from
AGM batteries to LifePO4 can continue to use existing charging systems if they have a similar set up to Impi.
Our installation was done
by Overkill Electrics (Pittwater) at a cost of about AU$5000. This included all additional parts such as
relays, two 175A Prestolite alternators, brackets to fix them onto the engines
and their installation.
We are conducting a full
evaluation at the moment with the assistance of Outback Marine (Southport) who
provide a similar installation using the same LiFePO4 batteries.
We hope to communicate our
findings in the new year but so far things are looking good! We are
particularly impressed with the lack of voltage drop when using several
electrical appliances even when the battery is discharged more than 50%. So watch this space for a full evaluation.
If this blog has been useful to you in anyway please consider a small donation to our animal welfare project ' Help us to Help Animals'.
If this blog has been useful to you in anyway please consider a small donation to our animal welfare project ' Help us to Help Animals'.
Another grew article guys. We're filing this one away for our decision on batteries in the late spring.
ReplyDeleteThanks John - we learn, we share. Have you looked at Carbon Foam and Lead Crystals too?
DeleteI've heard of both, but what are you using them for?
DeleteHi again John. No, we opted for LifePo4 but at the time we were searching for which route to go we also looked at the option of Carbon Foam and Lead Crystal. They refer to Carbon Foam as 'poor mans lithiums' but technically they have quite similar charge and discharge characteristics. The Lead Crystals also had interesting charge / discharge ability but once we weighed it all up we opted for the LifePo4. A year from now when my mate also on a similar cat to ours has spent full time sailing he will share his findings with us around Carbon Foam technology. In our very humble opinion LifePo4 is the way to go but Carbon Foam had me thinking carefully. They would be used for House Bank (replace AGM's or alternative to LifePo4)
DeleteHa! Talk slow and use lots of hand movements and eventually I'll get there...A quick Google tells me carbon foam has been in the military and heavy industry for a few years, but we're still seeing what a wider marine audience thinks. Lead crystal has some traffic in the solar world, but essentially an AGM that you can take down to lower voltages.
DeleteHi Brent you may be interested in this article David did a similar exercise on NIMROD in 2012.
ReplyDeletehttp://psyberspace.com.au/lithium.html
Hi David! Yes we read that article, very good. All the best Ana
DeleteExcellent article Brent, thank you.
ReplyDeleteWhat are your thoughts on LiFePo4 in a boat like the Lagoon 42 where the batteries reside in the engine compartment - perhaps too hot in there for lithium...?
Hi there Aaron! Thanks for reading our article. Unfortunately the engine compartment would be too hot. You would have to relocate to either under the couch in saloon or under bed in aft cabin. Outback Marine in Southport is doing this for a Fontaine Pajot in February. All the best Ana
DeleteThanks Ana, we're loving following your adventures :)
DeleteThanks for the article, and looking forward to your article/video on the 1 year evaluation results.
ReplyDeleteI know from your FB that you have been following the evolution of electric/hybrid propulsión.
At this stage it seems to me that with LifePO and Oceanvolt saildreives it all could start to make sense. My gut aproach is: 1 big Gen in one hull, smaller gen+LifePo in the other, with the following use pattern:
- Slip out from Marina under optimal conditions or Help lifting anchor: Electric from batteries
- Slip out from Marina under less tan optimal conditions and economical motorsailing: Electric from small genset+ (LifePo for Peak power)
- Full Power needed: Marina in/out under hard conditions, or motoring against strong headwinds: electric from both Gensets (+ LifePo for peak power)
LifePo recharging: from small or big genset depending on charge status, other concurrent loads (ac, watermaker....), and time available for recharge.
I believe this setup provides convenience (no fumes no noise power on most times), safety (full power available for extended periods), enough redundancy, and just 2 diesels to mantain instead of 3, with a reduced number of engine starts, so cheaper in theory maintenance costs.
Your views?
thanks in advance
Jose
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHi Jose, in terms of hybrids, we have only visited the solar wave yachts that have 2 electric motors and 1 generator as far as I remember. They run most of the time just on solar energy and have no sails. What about your idea: is this a sail yacht? Would you just power it with diesel? Regards Ana
DeleteHi Jose, Sorry for the delay in response but it has been very busy time for me. I see Ana answered earlier on but I think she may have misunderstood you - hopefully I understand what you are wanting to discuss and will say from the outset I have limited knowledge of these systems.
DeleteWe have a few friends running on similar systems and I must say they are not shy to tell me they have a lot of problems. However, if your electrical skills are good I would think this is an interesting way to go!
Solar Wave Catamarans are going this route running the boat powered exclusively from solar panels and backed up by a generator that charges lithium batteries.
At the Cannes Boat Show the skipper told me he could do 5 knots for 11 hours on battery and solar.
I like your logic on the set up and must say it appeals to my sense of logic, but I must admit that I can only go from what many different people share with me about the technology, and not on my own personal experience, and I like to share from a space of personal experience.
I would be interested to hear what route you decide to take.
I like your idea of a small generator along with a large generator as it offers a form of redundancy to the generator side and also means you can decide which generator to use when charging batteries for example, in order to keep load on it which generators must have for longer life.
For me personally - I feel the technology is developing quickly and I would like to see it settle into a more robust, tried and tested system with less issues before I venture on this course.
If you look on our Facebook page you will see a friend 'Cindy Balfour Smith' and they sail on this system on their boat called Full Circle. They are wonderful people who share form an honest space - it has not been a smooth road for them but they have FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE of these systems sailing around the world so I would recommend to chat with them before making a decision of which way to go.
In the meantime, yes, the diesel engines have more noise and fumes but ultimately we sail as much as possible and our lithiums charge quickly which means that with solar we don't use the generator too much. I would rather have the set up we have now with less technical issues to go wrong since I prefer holding a beer in my hand as opposed to a spanner, and for now my friends who have gone the electric/hybrid propulsion route seem to be having a ton of issues. If I were to go this way, I would probably want to fork out money and buy a catamaran from an established company like Solar Wave Yachts, but this may be above my current budget :)
Cheers my friend